Re: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'

From: Metaqualia (metaqualia@mynichi.com)
Date: Fri Jul 02 2004 - 21:27:09 MDT

• Next message: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Previous message: Metaqualia: "Re: "feels good" is inherently meaningful"
• In reply to: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Next in thread: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Reply: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Reply: Eugen Leitl: "Re: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> "Experiences only look special from the inside of the system."

And what about the outside of the system? No experiences, no meaning for the
word "look", no meaning for "Special" or "not special", or for anything
else.

mq

• Next message: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Previous message: Metaqualia: "Re: "feels good" is inherently meaningful"
• In reply to: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Next in thread: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Reply: mike99: "RE: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Reply: Eugen Leitl: "Re: Geddes's 'Moral Perturbation Theory'"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 07 2009 - 04:01:11 MST