Re: We need a new term?

From: xgl (xli03@emory.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 06 2001 - 18:58:46 MDT


On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Brian Atkins wrote:

> I think the terms "unFriendly" or "NFAI" are not the best possible word to
> describe those AIs that fall outside the set of Friendly-designed AIs.
> Since such AIs may not automatically turn out to unFriendly.
>
> What about "unconstrained"? That isn't quite right either, but it's the
> best I've found. Sabine suggests "raw AI".
>

        "generalized"? or "default"?

-x



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT