Re: intentional programming progress

From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Sat Apr 28 2001 - 16:15:25 MDT


Brian Atkins wrote:
>
> So they truly have solved the problem of having a "metalanguage" to express
> abstractions in, that can then be translated to concrete algorithms in any
> programming language? Or is it just hype?
>

It is just hype. Microsoft has some of the best IP talent as employees
but from what I've seen .NET doesn't use any of their truly IP ideas.
That said, a basic common VM language can be the common target for true
IP tools but that hardly means that such a VM language is IP.

- samantha



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT