From: Ben Goertzel (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jul 20 2001 - 16:13:42 MDT
> Ben Goertzel wrote:
> > Why on earth do you folks want logical control to be expressed in XML,
> > anyway?
> > I mean, XML is definitely too awkward for humans to want to use it for
> > programming.
> Yes, that's why we use FlareSpeak instead.
Sure, I understand that. But that was a side point in my post. The main
point is: what is the particular benefit of XML as an *internal*
representation for a programming language?
Do you actually want
a) Flare to *use* XML internally, or
b) just for there to exist a 1-1 mapping between the space of its internal
representation and some subspace of the space of well-formed XML
[Hint: the right answer is b ;) ]
I guess that b) is somewhat interesting, although the XML code for a
nontrivial program is going to be humanly incomprehensible anyway... more
specialized textual-rendering or visualization tools will obviously have to
be laid on top of the XML to make the code comprehensible...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT