Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)

From: DarkVegeta26@aol.com
Date: Fri Jan 18 2002 - 13:03:16 MST

• Next message: ben goertzel: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Previous message: ben goertzel: "Re: Michael Anissimov's 'Shock Level Analysis'"
• Maybe in reply to: John Smart: "Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Next in thread: ben goertzel: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Reply: ben goertzel: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 1/18/2002 3:35:08 AM Pacific Standard Time,
psiphius@yahoo.com writes:

<< Concluding Prediction: Any sufficiently advanced SI
 will be equally more benign than we are. >>

I wholeheartedly agree. Therefore, I believe that any initial coding as an
attempt to program benignity (Friendliness, Asimov's Three Laws, etc) is an
irrelevant waste of time (and unprogrammably arbitrary), only serving the
purpose of attracting investor dollars.

Michael Anissimov

• Next message: ben goertzel: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Previous message: ben goertzel: "Re: Michael Anissimov's 'Shock Level Analysis'"
• Maybe in reply to: John Smart: "Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Next in thread: ben goertzel: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Reply: ben goertzel: "Re: Steve Harris, "Return of the Krell Machine" (Singularity Article)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:37 MDT