From: Ben Goertzel (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Dec 31 2002 - 20:09:34 MST
> Indeed, if the "embodiment is necessary for AI" theory is correct, then
> embodied AI's should do far better on tests NOT involving
> embodiment in any
> explicit way. No?
My wording may have been unclear ...
I meant "... far better than non-embodied AI's on tests ... "
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:41 MDT