From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Feb 14 2004 - 19:27:16 MST
> [...] once it has enough intelligence and power, will simply seize all
> processing power in the universe for itself. I think this
> “Megalomaniac AI” scenario is mainly a result of rampant
> anthropomorphism. In this context it’s interesting to return to the
> notion of attractors. It may be that the Megalomaniac AI is an
> attractor, in that once such a beast starts rolling, it’s tough to
> stop. But the question is, how likely is it that a superhuman AI will
> start out in the basin of attraction of this particular attractor? My
> intuition is that the basin of attraction of this attractor is not
> particularly large. Rather, I think that in order to make a
> Megalomaniac AI, one would probably need to explicitly program an AI
> with a lust for power. Then, quite likely, this lust for power would
> manage to persist through repeated self-modifications – “lust for
> power” being a robustly simple-yet-abstract principle. On the other
> hand, if one programs one’s initial AI with an initial state aimed at a
> different attractor meta-ethic, there probably isn’t much chance of
> convergence into the megalomaniacal condition.
1) Are you aware of how important this question is?
2) Are you aware of the consequences if you're wrong?
-- Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://singinst.org/ Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 20 2013 - 04:00:45 MDT