From: Thomas Buckner (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Jun 05 2004 - 07:17:29 MDT
I will register my current opinion of your assertions
as a percentage, with 0 being complete
disagreement/you're flat wrong and 100 being complete
--- Marc Geddes <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Speaking of intuition I thought I'd publically
> my claims about AGI again (all of which Eli
> My claims were:
> (1) General intelligence without sentience is
> (2) Total altruism in a general intelligence is
> impossible (although say 90% altruism might be
> (3) There is a degree of sentience in everything -
> rocks, electrons etc (panpsychism).
Part 1 of this 2-part statement: 40%
> There will
> to be a precise scientific way to measure the
> sentience of anything.
Part 2: 20%
> (4) There is an objective morality.
A snake pit. 10%
> 4 claims put forward by me, 4 claims disputed by
> Eliezer. O.K, then, time to put our rival
> to the test. Let's wait and eventually the truth or
> falsity of all 4 claims should be established. I
> really look forward to that day ;)
> It's my intellect versus Eliezer's intellect. Who
> you guys bet on?
So I (as a layman with less credentials than an
expensive dog or a reporter for the Weekly World News)
think you're probably but not certainly right on
claims 1 and 2, perhaps right on some form of
panpsychism but probably wrong that it can be
(usefully) measured, and on very thin ice with claim
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 21 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT