From: Marc Geddes (marc_geddes@yahoo.co.nz)
Date: Wed Mar 16 2005 - 23:54:24 MST
Tennessee Leeuwenburg said>>>
>I saw immediate parallels between the
>inductive/deductive dichotomy
>which you identified in your philosophy, and the
>Intuition/Formal
>System dichotomy which I identify in mine.
Sorry, my ideas have nothing in common with yours. A
vague fuzzy idea like what you had does not make a
theory. People on SL4 have flamed me enough times in
the past for blurting out vague fuzzy ideas here.
My inductive/deductive division is not a 'Dialectic'
like your intuition/reason. Instead it's a synergy.
I hopefully clarified this in my previous post: I have
two systems of reasoning: one for reasoning about
morals/values/agents, the other for reasoning about
physics/inanimate things. But both are systems of
reasoning. Just in cazse you're interested, here are
some more of the synergistic pairs in my theory:
Heath-Happiness
Altruism-Growth
Eudaimonia-Volition
Explanation-Perception
Pattern-Meaning
Coherence-Causality
--- THE BRAIN is wider than the sky, For, put them side by side, The one the other will include With ease, and you beside. -Emily Dickinson 'The brain is wider than the sky' http://www.bartleby.com/113/1126.html --- Please visit my web-site: Mathematics, Mind and Matter http://www.riemannai.org/ --- Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies. http://au.movies.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:50 MDT