Re: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?

From: Martin Striz (mstriz@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 20 2005 - 22:46:01 MDT

• Next message: Martin Striz: "Re: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Previous message: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• In reply to: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Next in thread: Martin Striz: "Re: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Reply: Martin Striz: "Re: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Reply: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On 7/21/05, Ben Goertzel <ben@goertzel.org> wrote:
 
> Well, as a moderately relevant side point, the hypothesis of invisible pink
> unicorns (like the hypothesis of aether) seems not to lead to useful
> verifiable hypotheses. The hypothesis of qualia (much like "force") does
> seem to...

Like what? You never provided that in the earlier message.

Martin

• Next message: Martin Striz: "Re: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Previous message: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• In reply to: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Next in thread: Martin Striz: "Re: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Reply: Martin Striz: "Re: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Reply: Ben Goertzel: "RE: Objective versus subjective reality: which is primary?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:51 MDT