From: Jeff Medina (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Sep 11 2005 - 20:41:14 MDT
Hi, Ben. Fancy meeting you here. ;)
Jeff wrote, "The only assumption required is that our sample space is finite."
>> Suppose you have a population of 10 birds of different colors,
>> and no other knowledge about the population.
>> If you sample one of the birds and find that it's a purple goose,
>> why does this count as information that all the RAVENS in the
>> population are black?"
Because it is evidence that [all non-black objects are non-ravens]. If
we know at least one raven exists, and sampling a non-black object
produces a non-raven on each of N sampling events, then with
increasing N comes increasing certainty that no non-black object is a
raven. And [no non-black object is a raven] is, of course, logically
and conceptually equivalent to [all ravens are black], given the tiny
extra assumption I left out earlier that at least one raven exists.
It's pretty clear to me that Hempel's paradox presupposes the
existence of its referents, but if you disagree and think it's a
sticking point, I'm happy to concede that a purple goose is only
evidence that [all ravens are black] if and only if there exists at
least one raven.
-- Jeff Medina http://www.painfullyclear.com/ Community Director Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence http://www.singinst.org/ Relationships & Community Fellow Institute for Ethics & Emerging Technologies http://www.ieet.org/ School of Philosophy, Birkbeck, University of London http://www.bbk.ac.uk/phil/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 20 2013 - 04:01:02 MDT