From: Philip Goetz (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2006 - 13:06:24 MST
On 3/22/06, Richard Loosemore <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Michael Vassar wrote:
> > It would be SL4 if it was somehow possible to teach a high power savant
> > to do applied Bayesian reasoning and decision theory in everyday life in
> > a useful way. Maybe it would be worth the time for someone in the
> Good grief, I have to say that I couldn't disagree more!
> What exactly would be the result of teaching him to do applied Bayesian
> reasoning? (And how do you justify your answer?)
The answers to these questions are so obvious that I fear
stating them would do no good here. Richard, you seem to
have an emotional reaction. Why? It seems you think that teaching
a savant how to reason would be abusing him.
The purpose is not to build Searle's Chinese room, just to see what
the fellow could accomplish. Whether, for instance, thorough-going
Bayesian decisions could help him achieve his goals, in a way that
super-geniuses tend not to.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 18 2013 - 04:01:00 MDT