From: John K Clark (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jun 08 2006 - 10:29:14 MDT
"Mitchell Howe" <email@example.com>
> After all, it could be that I simply disagree with the argumentative
> trends, and am subconsciously, Ouija-style, sliding the crosshairs
> according to my own biases.
I hope I don't come off sounding rude but for the life of me I can't think
of another explanation. Correct me if I'm mistaken but it seems to me the
fundamental purpose of SL4 is to discuss AI and friendly AI in particular; I
could be wrong but I don't believe snuffing out any thread that examines the
basic foundation of this will lead to enlightenment.
The entire friendly AI concept is supported by two pillars:
1) The stupid ordering the brilliant is an inherently stable configuration
that can persist indefinitely.
2) The stupid leading the brilliant will arrive at a glorious destination.
I believe both these ideas are fundamentally and profoundly wrong, but it's
your list not mine, I respect private property and I know you don't want
these matters pursued so I'll say no more about them on this list.
John K Clark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:56 MDT