From: Jef Allbright (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Aug 11 2006 - 14:13:16 MDT
On 8/11/06, Keith Henson <email@example.com> wrote:
> At 06:13 PM 8/10/2006 -0700, Jef Allbright wrote:
> (In reply to Eliezer)
> >Mightn't it be reasonable in such a scenario
> >to exert influence by beginning as early as possible to promote the
> >amplification of human morality?
> >On the other hand, if you expect proliferation of a diverse range of
> >AI and IA technology leading up to the big FOOM, then again, mightn't
> >it be reasonable to exploit this growth of intelligence toward
> >development of a framework for increasingly moral social
> I may be wrong about this, but I think what we consider to be "good" moral
> social decision-making is highly dependent on the perception of the
> society's members about future prospects.
Yes, moral concerns gain importance with increasing scope of time,
interactees, or types of interactions.
> A *long* time of relatively positive prospects allows anti war and social
> justice memes to become dominate. That's more or less the situation in the
> western world today.
True, but I would say it's not the length of preceding "positive"
time, but rather the resulting expectation of future "positive" time
that drives the effect you are describing here.
> On the other hand, bleak prospects (or being attacked) causes xenophobic
> memes to become dominate. I suspect the trip into negative memes can be
> much faster than the rise of memes for social tolerance and social justice.
Restated: Similarly, perception of a shortened time horizon reduces
the scope, and thus the importance of moral concerns.
> A set of xenophobic memes dominates in a substantial sector of the world today.
> When you think about it, it makes sense for those you treat well to be
> dependent on future prospects. Bad enough and it shrinks down to immediate
> family. Good enough and it incorporates all peoples your group might
> possibly obtain wives from.
> All in the interest of the genes.
But the underlying process of evolution (in the broad sense) has
agency moving beyond the limitations of the genes.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT