From: Russell Wallace (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Aug 24 2006 - 23:03:36 MDT
On 8/25/06, Michael Vassar <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I propose a vote by list participants.
> On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is unmoderated, 4 is the current level of
> moderation, 8 is the theoretical level of moderation mandated in the list
> charter, and 10 is a "three strikes rule" for clueless or seriously off
> topic posts, what level of moderation do people want?
4: I think the list is very well moderated as it stands, and a change is
unlikely to be an improvement.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT