From: Tennessee Leeuwenburg (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Aug 24 2006 - 23:26:26 MDT
Michael Vassar wrote:
> Good point Damien. I would actually say that by the theoretical
> (though not the applied) standards of this list, Patrick deserves to
> be sniped for this. Of course, if the snipers lived up to the
> theoretical standards there would be far fewer than half the current
> number of posters.
> I propose a vote by list participants.
> On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is unmoderated, 4 is the current level
> of moderation, 8 is the theoretical level of moderation mandated in
> the list charter, and 10 is a "three strikes rule" for clueless or
> seriously off topic posts, what level of moderation do people want?
> (possibly giving actual SIAI members or donors some larger share of
> My vote is for a moderation level of 7, not holding people quite up to
> the standards of the charter but banning people for posts that show
> unfamiliarity with publically available www.intelligence.org documents or
> core transhumanist concepts and technologies.
>> From: Damien Broderick <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Reply-To: email@example.com
>> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Subject: Re: Dark matter (was: What's going on this decade?)
>> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:05:48 -0500
>> At 06:51 AM 8/24/2006 -0400, Patrick Crenshaw wrote:
>>> I don't know what exactly Eliezer's brand of objective morality is,
>>> but I would certainly like to see something demonstrating that it is
>>> the doctrine of morons. Care to send a link?
>>> On 8/15/06, *Eliezer S. Yudkowsky* <email@example.com wrote:
>>> Obviously morality would be measured in "morons".
>> Is nobody paying attention?
>> Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT