From: Russell Wallace (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Aug 28 2006 - 23:42:25 MDT
On 8/29/06, Rik van Riel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Once we have a few AGI instances out there, and we can understand
> how they work, maybe then I could find an objective answer to your
> question. To be honest, it wouldn't surprise me if all our current
> ideas about AGI were wrong, otherwise we might have one already.
Not all. It's slow, painfully despairingly slow, but we do now have some
ideas that are pretty much in the right compass direction at least. We've
walked through the chaos; it's down through computer science and homing in
on software engineering.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:57 MDT