Re: Simulation argument in the NY Times

From: Stathis Papaioannou (stathisp@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2007 - 04:10:50 MDT


On 20/08/07, Randall Randall <randall@randallsquared.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> >
> > I mean consciousness as that which distinguishes people from
> > philosophical
> > zombies.
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie
>
> But is there any reason to think that the concept of a
> philosophical zombie makes any sense? In order for it
> to make sense, you have to have found that consciousness
> isn't a physical process. Do you believe you have
> evidence for this view?

It's logically possible that consciousness is due to a physical
process, but a different physical process might result in no
consciousness or different consciousness despite similar external
behaviour.

-- 
Stathis Papaioannou


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:58 MDT