From: Peter de Blanc (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2007 - 22:12:46 MDT
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 20:24 -0700, Tim Freeman wrote:
> bits to transform an explanation of the world that says "these are the
> laws of physics" into one that says "these are the laws of physics
> because this simulator run by people with these motives computes it",
A precise hypothesis (i.e. code) doesn't say "B because A." It says "A,"
and B follows automatically.
"Circuit X computes square roots" is not a simpler hypothesis than
"Circuit X computes square roots because of Maxwell's Laws," because one
only needs to hypothesize Maxwell's Laws and the behavior of the circuit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 22 2013 - 04:01:23 MDT