From: Shane Antyr (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2008 - 16:03:49 MST
This is all amusing, since everyone here seems to assume an
anthropomorphic ethic would be held by some advanced race or entity. It
also assumes that if this were a sim that it isn't a 'game' we entered
into voluntarily and that other actors we see in the system are sentient
agents. I can think of a lot of reasons to have an 'evil' sim; must be
because I'm evil.
Enjoy the ride,
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 17:39 -0500, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008 4:59 PM, Randall Randall <email@example.com> wrote:
> > The idea that in a future civilization something
> > done entirely with private computing could be
> > disallowed implies a crippling lack freedom for
> > individuals in said civilization.
> If you value freedom, you shouldn't tolerate creating people and
> confining them in vastly suboptimal conditions without any knowledge
> of their confinement or possibility even in principle of escape.
> That's generally regarded as evil.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:01 MDT