From: Diego Navarro (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2008 - 17:30:19 MDT
Well, I'm looking into right now. Leverage the APIs. AGI could come
faster with reputation markets. Things go better with coke.
People are already subscribing to RSS feeds. That's a vote. A reddit
upvote is a vote. And you don't need to impose restrictions on votes.
On 18/03/2008, at 18:26, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> --- Diego Navarro <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I have drafted out a modest proposal.
> I agree with your assessment that information has negative value on
> and a rating system is needed. The implementation bottleneck seems
> to be how
> to pay people to rate it. In my distributed AGI proposal at
> http://www.mattmahoney.net/agi.html a peer in a P2P network is
> motivated to
> rate incoming messages accurately (i.e. forward useful stuff to the
> peers and block spam) because this behavior raises its reputation so
> fewer peers block its own outgoing messages.
> -- Matt Mahoney, firstname.lastname@example.org
"Escrever nada a ver tem com significar, mas com agrimensar,
cartografar, mesmo que sejam regiões ainda por vir." (Mil Platôs #11)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:02 MDT