From: Jeff L Jones (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2008 - 00:15:27 MDT
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Matt Mahoney <email@example.com> wrote:
> They may indeed give the same results, but that is not the approach I used. I
> counted states as a function of volume and mass/energy, then set those values
> to that of the universe. I only used the Schwarzchild radius to estimate the
> mass of the universe.
I don't see how this goes against anything I wrote. The fact that you
used a Schwarzchild radius at all seems to indicate to me that you're
borrowing the same formula that the Bekenstein bound is derived from.
But maybe I'm just not understanding the method you used.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:02 MDT