From: Nick Tarleton (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Apr 17 2008 - 16:23:55 MDT
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Jeff L Jones <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Nick Tarleton <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Jeff L Jones <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > I guess my question would be why you value your life more than your
> > > copy's, if you are both identiical aside from a few neurons here and
> > > there? They both should have roughly the same value to you.
> > But when one exists, the other has very little marginal value. I think.
> That's not relevant to this particular question. We're comparing the
> value of one being alive while the other is dead, versus the other
> being alive while the first is dead. I claim these have roughly the
> same value, until their minds diverge more.
Oh, sorry, I misunderstood your point. I agree.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:02 MDT