From: Nick Tarleton (nickptar@gmail.com)
Date: Tue May 06 2008 - 06:21:06 MDT
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Stathis Papaioannou <stathisp@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you considered the possibility that not everything about a person
> could be understood by analysing a limited set of observations? Even
> if you if you had knowledge of the human's brain down to the molecular
> level, due to the effect of chaos after a short time his behaviour
> would deviate from any simulation you might run.
Then how could signaling be any more useful? It's very unlikely to be
any better of a predictor of how future chaotic neural firings will
go.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:02 MDT