Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?

From: Charles Hixson (charleshixsn@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed Jun 25 2008 - 19:49:06 MDT

• Next message: Stathis Papaioannou: "Re: [sl4] Evolutionary Explanation: Why It Wants Out"
• Previous message: Lee Corbin: "Re: [sl4] Evolutionary Explanation: Why It Wants Out"
• In reply to: Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"
• Next in thread: William Pearson: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Monday 23 June 2008 01:32:27 am Peter de Blanc wrote:
> J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
> ...Since there
> are infinitely many programs in this sequence, their complexity must
> grow without bound. ...
> - Peter de Blanc

Eh? I don't see under what rule you are calling any one of those programs
more complex than any other. To me they all look equivalent in complexity.

• Next message: Stathis Papaioannou: "Re: [sl4] Evolutionary Explanation: Why It Wants Out"
• Previous message: Lee Corbin: "Re: [sl4] Evolutionary Explanation: Why It Wants Out"
• In reply to: Peter de Blanc: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"
• Next in thread: William Pearson: "Re: [sl4] Is there a model for RSI?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:03 MDT