Re: [sl4] what's with all the math?

From: Johnicholas Hines (johnicholas.hines@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 13 2009 - 08:14:32 MDT

Next message: Randall Randall: "Re: [sl4] Complete drivel on this list: was: I am a Singularitian who does not believe in the Singularity."
Previous message: Mike Dougherty: "Re: [sl4] Complete drivel on this list: was: I am a Singularitian who does not believe in the Singularity."
In reply to: Pavitra: "Re: [sl4] what's with all the math?"
Next in thread: Luke: "Re: [sl4] what's with all the math?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Pavitra <celestialcognition@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know whether a formal definition of intelligence exists or is
> possible. (I left the checkbox on step C unchecked, you'll notice.)

Note: Hutter and Legg have a paper containing (one) formal definition
of intelligence.

Next message: Randall Randall: "Re: [sl4] Complete drivel on this list: was: I am a Singularitian who does not believe in the Singularity."
Previous message: Mike Dougherty: "Re: [sl4] Complete drivel on this list: was: I am a Singularitian who does not believe in the Singularity."
In reply to: Pavitra: "Re: [sl4] what's with all the math?"
Next in thread: Luke: "Re: [sl4] what's with all the math?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:04 MDT