From: Matt Paul (lizardblue@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 25 2009 - 16:38:38 MST
On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Stathis Papaioannou <stathisp@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>
> How do you figure that quantum phenomena are "non physical" when they
> are the basis of all physics? Also, quantum computers don't actually
> do anything that classical computers don't do, such as computing
> non-computable functions.
>
Ok, I see a problem arising here. I used the term "non-physical" and I
think that I should clarify that this is because I struggle to find
another term for it. I don't think it is the best term and I hope we
don't get too hung up on it. By non-physical I am trying to label that
which is real but cannot currently be measured or detected.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:05 MDT