From: Matt Paul (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Nov 25 2009 - 20:10:27 MST
I suppose that might be what I mean. It's a damn interesting question.
On Nov 25, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Matt Mahoney <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> By non-physical I am trying to label that which is real but cannot
>> currently be measured or detected.
> Like, for example, that thing that makes you different from a
> philosophical zombie? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie
> Or if I removed your brain, ground it to a pulp, and then replaced
> it with a computer that had exactly the same behavior so that nobody
> could detect any change in the behavior of your body, then you mean
> that invisible thing that is now missing from you?
> Is it the thing you so desperately want to preserve, because like
> all animals, you have evolved to fear the hundreds of different
> things that can kill you? If it weren't for those strong emotions,
> would you even need such a concept?
> -- Matt Mahoney, email@example.com
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Matt Paul <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Wed, November 25, 2009 6:38:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [sl4] Re: goals of AI... non physical components of
> mind != soul
> On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> How do you figure that quantum phenomena are "non physical" when they
>> are the basis of all physics? Also, quantum computers don't actually
>> do anything that classical computers don't do, such as computing
>> non-computable functions.
> Ok, I see a problem arising here. I used the term "non-physical" and
> I think that I should clarify that this is because I struggle to
> find another term for it. I don't think it is the best term and I
> hope we don't get too hung up on it. By non-physical I am trying to
> label that which is real but cannot currently be measured or detected.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:05 MDT