From: Mark Nuzzolilo (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Mar 13 2011 - 13:18:39 MDT
Agree completely regarding the activity of the list. But.... What does
"Less Wrong" have to do with SL4? I thought this was the SL4 list, not the
Eliezer list.... That's the kind of mentality that pushed a lot of people
off of this list in the first place.
Why not suggest a place that has more to do with the original topics? Has
that become too mundane, too boring, for anyone who isn't "clueless"?
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Vladimir Nesov <email@example.com> wrote:
> Seconded. Only clueless post here now (outside of announcements), and
> their posts are not engaged by the old hands. The list web page needs
> links to LW/SIAI/FHI, with the list itself closed.
> At the same time, LW doesn't have SL4's topics as official or to some
> extent actual focus of discussion. Closing SL4 would ideally call for
> creating an LW-based discussion focus on its topics, as a subreddit or
> as an officially endorsed topic in discussion area. Perhaps SL4 should
> wait for that to happen, if only as a reminder.
> Vladimir Nesov
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 18 2013 - 04:01:15 MDT