From: James Rogers (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 13 2001 - 00:44:31 MST
On 3/12/01 8:22 PM, "Dale Johnstone" <DaleJohnstone@email.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure how useful a graphics processor would be for general AI
> work, but I suspect it's possible to implement some kind of neural
> style processing with judicious use of texture compositing hardware in
> combination with the z-buffer (or stencil buffer).
In any case, it is largely irrelevant, as memory size/speed is far more of a
limitation on general AI than instructions per second (not strictly true if
you are trying to map biological models onto silicon, but I don't consider
that to be efficient anyway). So I don't see this chip as any substantial
breakthrough as far as AI is concerned.
> Ben: Have you thought about compressing your data before paging to/from
> disk? And why use Java anyway? Nice language to work with, but it blows
> goats in the memory use department... :)
Perhaps because minor linear improvements in memory speed and availability
don't justify the programming effort when the need is for exponentially
larger memory? No point in wasting the effort; one might as well wait for
the hardware to catch up because you'll get there about the same time for
almost the same amount of money.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT