From: Bill Hibbard (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 10:54:50 MST
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Gary Miller wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2002, Bill Hibbard wrote:
> >> Furthermore, behaviors learned via their old greedy or xenophobic
> values would be negatively
> >> reinforced and disappear.
> How do you give negative reinforcement to someone who has succeeded so
> far beyond the average man that they are both spiritually, emotionally
> and physically untouchable?
Reinforcement values can be built into the basic learning
architecture of a brain. The communist experiments of the
twentieth century demonstrated the difficulty of changing
basic human values.
> Obsessive fear of losing what one has already worked so hard to achieve
> is one of the drivers for achieving ever increasing power and wealth.
> Perhaps it is the recognition and fear of one's eventual mortality today
> that encourages the very rich to share the wealth through philanthropy
> and to invest in their afterlife so to speak. Once a person has reached
> this level of success and power, I would defy anyone to reeducate them
> to the fact that giving a large portion of their money away is the
> optimal way to further their own self-interests especially if their
> life-spans were hugely extended.
This just seconds what I said in my message: socially
imposed values can be easily over-powered by the innate
values of human brains, in humans with the power to ignore
Thus to insure human safety in a world populated by super-
intelligent machines or humans, the basic (hard-wired)
reinforcement learning values of super-intelligent brains
must be the happiness of all humans.
> We live in a day again where the middle class is being eroded from the
> top and bottom. The rich do get richer and the poor are becoming more
> numerous. I have a tremendous respect for people like Bill Gates who
> are spending large amounts of their money in this life to improve living
> conditions in so many parts of the world. I would pray to see this
> become the norm instead of the exception. But unfortunately too many
> billionaires still operate under the philosophy that "whoever dies with
> the most toys (or billions) wins the game".
Bill Gates may not be all that altruistic. Perhaps he is trying
to counteract the bad publicity of the M$ antitrust case. His
anti-AIDS campaign is wonderful, but it is interesting that it is
targeted at India where there are many talented programmers, rather
than Africa where there are not so many programmers.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Bill
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:00 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Uploading with current technology
> Hi Gordon,
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Gordon Worley wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 01:08 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> > > http://users.rcn.com/standley/AI/immortality.htm
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Can anyone with more neuro expertise tell me: Is this guy correct as
> > > regards what is currently technologically plausible?
> > The Singularity and, specifically, FAI is a faster, safer way of
> > transcending. Super *human* intelligence is highly dangerous. Think
> > male chimp with nuclear feces. Unless you've got someone way protect
> > the universe from the super *humans*, we're probably better off with
> > our current brains.
> I largely agree. But as I point out in my book:
> after humans meet super-intelligent machines they will want
> to become super-intelligent themselves, and will want the indfinite life
> span of a repairable machine brain supporting their mind.
> With super-intelligent machines, the key to human safety is
> in controlling the values that reinforce learning of intelligent
> behaviors. In machines, we can design them so their behaviors are
> positively reinforced by human happiness and negatively reinforced by
> human unhappiness.
> Behaviors are reinforced by much different values in human brains. Human
> values are mostly self-interest. As social animals humans have some more
> altruistic values, but these mostly depend on social pressure. Very
> powerful humans can transcend social pressure and revert to their
> selfish values, hence the maxim that power corrupts and absolute power
> corrupts absolutely. Nothing will give a human more power than
> Society has a gradual (lots of short-term setbacks, to be
> sure) long-term trend toward equality because human brains
> are distributed quite democratically: the largest IQ (not
> a perfect measure, but widely applied) in history is only
> twice the average. However, the largest computers, buildings, trucks,
> etc are thousands of times their averages. The migration of human minds
> into machine brains theatens to end the even distribution of human
> intelligence, and hence end the gradual long-term trend toward social
> Given that the combination of super-intelligence and human values is
> dangerous, the solution is to make alteration of reinforcement learning
> values a necessary condition for granting a human super-intelligence.
> That is, when we have the technology to manipulate human intelligence
> then we also need to develop the technology to manipulate human
> reinforcement learning values. Because this change in values would
> affect learning, it would not immediately change the human's old
> behaviors. Hence they would still "be themselves". But as they learned
> super-intelligent behaviors, their new values would cause those newly
> learned behaviors to serve the happiness of all humans. Furthermore,
> behaviors learned via their old greedy or xenophobic values would be
> negatively reinforced and disappear.
> One danger is the temptation to use genetic manipulation as a shortcut
> to super-intelligent humans. This may provide a way to increase human
> intelligence before we understand how it works and before we know how to
> change human reinforcement learning values. This danger is neatly
> parallel with Mary Shelley's Frankestein, in which a human monster is
> created by a scientist tinkering with technology thet he did not really
> understand. We need to understand how human brains work and solve the
> AGI problem before we start manipulating human brains.
> Bill Hibbard, SSEC, 1225 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706
> email@example.com 608-263-4427 fax: 608-263-6738
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 17 2013 - 04:00:36 MDT