Re: The influence of skeptics [WAS Re: no more lottery talk]

From: BillK (pharos@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 02 2006 - 11:14:14 MST


On 1/2/06, Richard Loosemore wrote:
> More generally, though, it is difficult for me to pick one reference on
> this: if you go to the literature and look up "sheep-goat effect" you
> should find hundreds of examples.
>

As Michael Shermer has commented:
"But wouldn't that mean that this claim is ultimately nonfalsifiable?
If both positive and negative results are interpreted as supporting a
theory, how can we test its validity?
Skepticism is the default position because the burden of proof is on
the believer, not the skeptic."

BillK



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:00:55 MDT