From: Lee Corbin (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Apr 07 2008 - 22:04:08 MDT
> But this isn't a question about rational utility, it's a question
> about ethics. In my opinion, it's unethical to torture people,
> regardless of whether that fits with what you're calling the
> "rational" strategy. In other words, if I get $1000 for torturing
> random person in [Africa], and only $1 for not torturing them... you
> might say that rationally, I should chose the $1000. But that would
> be unethical.
I believe that I would call it unethical too, though I always
question the objective status of such claims. You and I
would simply strongly disapprove (a statement that has
no questionable elements in it so far as I can see) of
someone signing up to receive the $1000 here.
> Another way to say this is that I've been programmed with the
> "friendliness meme" at some point.
> Which causes me to behave "irrationally" according to
> your purely self-interest strategy.
And you are quite right to put "irrationally" in scare
quotes because *rationality* so far as I know has
to be divorced from ethics, on pain of crossing the
is/ought boundary, which at best is incoherent.
> I would argue that my behavior is not actually
> irrational, it's just that my goals involve more
> than just simple self-interest.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:02 MDT