Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?

From: John K Clark (johnkclark@fastmail.fm)
Date: Tue Dec 01 2009 - 13:07:24 MST

Next message: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
Previous message: Johnicholas Hines: "Re: [sl4] Uploading (was : goals of AI)"
In reply to: Robin Lee Powell: "[sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
Next in thread: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
Reply: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 "Robin Lee Powell" <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
said:

> How many computer science Ph.D.s would I have to get to say, in
> writing, that that's utter nonsense for you to thoroughly
> re-evaluate your position?

John K Clark

-- 
  John K Clark
  johnkclark@fastmail.fm
-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own

Next message: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
Previous message: Johnicholas Hines: "Re: [sl4] Uploading (was : goals of AI)"
In reply to: Robin Lee Powell: "[sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
Next in thread: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
Reply: Robin Lee Powell: "Re: [sl4] JKC, are your views actually amenable to correction, ever?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:05 MDT