From: J. Andrew Rogers (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Jun 22 2008 - 22:42:50 MDT
On Jun 22, 2008, at 9:31 PM, Peter de Blanc wrote:
> Your first sentence is true, but you're incorrect about there being
> no change in complexity. The extra complexity is in the number.
The length of a program's output is not its complexity. And where
does this number exist?
J. Andrew Rogers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 17 2013 - 04:01:03 MDT